British scientists refuse to abandon hope for a solution to climate change but have said that a plan to limit greenhouse gases needs to be developed
A decade ago, climate change could cause global temperature rise to spike by 1 degree Celsius or more, or wipe out life on earth within 50 years. But scientists are still talking tough about the chances of averting catastrophe.
Scientists fear that, in the coming decades, climate change is only half the battle.
They want to see dramatic reduction in emissions of carbon dioxide — the major greenhouse gas that comes fxo 카지노rom burning fossil fuels such as coal and oil — to slash emissions of methane and nitrous oxide, also known as ‘dirty’ gases.
Scientists fear that, in the coming decades, climate change is only half the battle. The world will have to adapt to the changing climate
The hope among climate scientists is that the world can keep temperatures from rising much higher than 2C — a threshold considered unlikely by some.
But in the current climate, that’s going to be too difficult, climate change activists argue. They have said the world should follow China’s lead — one of the countries trying to address climate change — by cutting carbon emissions and limiting carbon emissions from human beings.
And a key problem for that plan is the so-called ‘business-as-usual’ scenario, where fossil fuels and natural gas are used up for the foreseeable future and then will continue to be burned up until human beings use all of the natural resources on the planet to produce electricity and heat to power homes.
But the International Energy Agency said in its latest report that there are several ‘business-as-usual’ scenarios in which that scenario would remain the case, and that the risk of glo바카라 사이트bal warming reaching dangerous levels were increasing.
Climate change activists have said that the world should follow China’s lead — one of the countries trying to address climate change
So what would be the best way to mitigate global warming from a man-made source in a year or so?
Professor Kevin Trenberth, a professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Yale University in New Haven, New Haven, is one of the scientists who has become well-known for taking the anti-pipeline position.
And he thinks that it is time for governments to get serious about tackling climate change.
He believes that if there’s a way to meet the emissions targets set by the EU and the United States, there is an obvious way to do so without breaking the climate deal struc